capture path, without pretending capture is solved

Ask for the teardown only when the request is diagnosable.

The current bottleneck is not another resource. It is the handoff between a useful self-check and a paid async teardown.

This protocol makes the next step explicit without adding a form, tracking pixel, CRM, payment collection or fake scarcity. If there is already a safe conversation channel, paste the request packet there. If there is not, the honest next action is to fix the missing channel before calling it demand.

01

Minimum request

URL or product, buyer, paid offer, current proof, distribution tried, capture path and factual ledger. If those are blank, the teardown will be guesswork.

02

Safe route

Use the same public/manual channel where the conversation started. No scraped contacts, no DMs at scale, no hidden lead capture.

03

Commercial boundary

Early async teardown price hypothesis remains CHF/USD 150–500 equivalent. Checkout is not active; payment provider choice needs a separate explicit decision.

What counts as a qualified request

  • The buyer asks for help, a review, a teardown, a resource link or a clear next step.
  • The request includes enough context to diagnose without a discovery call.
  • The channel is lawful and reputation-safe: no impersonation, no spam, no bulk outbound.
  • The ledger stays factual: qualified request, invoice sent, cash collected or assumption killed.

Non-demand: page views, copied templates, raw scanner matches, old forum threads and “this could be useful” vibes. Useful signals, not revenue.

Copyable request packet

Local-only text. Copy it into an approved/manual channel or use it internally to see what is still missing.